Peer Review Process
JURAGAN: Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan follows a strict and transparent review process to ensure the quality of published articles. The journal applies a double-blind peer review system in which authors and reviewers remain anonymous.
Submission and Initial Evaluation
All manuscripts undergo editorial screening to ensure scope suitability and guideline compliance.
Peer Review
Each manuscript is reviewed by at least two independent reviewers with relevant expertise.
Double-Blind Review
Author and reviewer identities are kept confidential to ensure fairness and objectivity.
Review Criteria
Evaluation is based on scientific quality, originality, relevance, clarity, and ethics.
Review Duration
Reviewers are given approximately one month for each review round.
Decision and Revision
Decisions may include accept, minor revision, major revision, or reject.
Editorial Decision
Final decision is made by the Editor-in-Chief or Editorial Board.
Confidentiality
All manuscripts are confidential documents.
Process Improvement
The journal continuously improves the review process.